Preaching to the choir moment......One thing this boils down to time and again is semantics..... "assault weapon". Even when the NRA, et al. address this moniker, they (NFOA?) define it as a machine gun i.e. M4, etc. In MY opinion, even this is wrong and should be challenged. "Assault weapon" can be a VERY broad definition. We gun owners hear it all of the time and even use our own comparisons....cars, bottles, knives, hammers, bare hands, etc. Yet, we still allow the moonbats to argue with their made up definition of guns. Yes, I am well aware of the history of the term "assault weapon".
Breaking down the dictionary definitions of both "assault" and "weapon" have NOTHING to do with machine guns or firearms in context to how the anti 2A folks are using them.. ANYTHING can be used a a weapon and assault with such can be prosecuted as such. Personally, I don't let the term play a role in my conversations, nor do I fall into the "modern sporting rifle" terminology. The conversation for me ends when they bring to it made up words/definitions. My rant for the day... and for what its worth Omaha is a lost cause no matter who the Mayor is .....
