< Back to the Main Site
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7   Go Down

Author Topic: ATF to reclassify armor piercing ammo  (Read 13281 times)

Offline wcr

  • NFOA Full Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Jan 2013
  • Posts: 96
Re: ATF to reclassify armor piercing ammo
« Reply #100 on: March 10, 2015, 03:51:45 PM »

CNN News article dated Mar 10, 2015.
Title:  Obama administration scraps bullet ban after push back

http://www.cnn.com/2015/03/09/politics/gun-rights-group-ad-campaign-armor-piercing-bullet-ban/
Logged

Offline bullit

  • NFOA Full Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Feb 2009
  • Posts: 2143
Re: ATF to reclassify armor piercing ammo
« Reply #101 on: March 10, 2015, 04:03:37 PM »
Lots of stupid people with VERY expensive ammo now .... ;)
Logged

Offline 2550sx

  • NFOA Full Member
  • **
  • Join Date: May 2013
  • Posts: 30
Re: ATF to reclassify armor piercing ammo
« Reply #102 on: March 10, 2015, 04:36:43 PM »
wonder how long it will take for prices to drop back down....????this time.
Logged

Offline bkoenig

  • Gun Show Volunteer
  • Powder Benefactor
  • *
  • Join Date: May 2009
  • Location: Lincoln, NE
  • Posts: 3677
  • Aspiring cranky old gun nut
Re: ATF to reclassify armor piercing ammo
« Reply #103 on: March 10, 2015, 04:51:56 PM »
Like Andy said, this isn't over.  They haven't dropped anything, they're extending the comment and review process.  They still intend to move forward with the ban.  Too many people are celebrating a victory when we haven't won yet.
Logged

Offline FarmerRick

  • NFOA Co-Founder
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2008
  • Location: Valley, NE
  • Posts: 3250
  • Antagonist of liberals, anti-hunters & hoplophobes
Re: ATF to reclassify armor piercing ammo
« Reply #104 on: March 10, 2015, 05:48:04 PM »
Quote from: bkoenig on March 10, 2015, 04:51:56 PM
Like Andy said, this isn't over.  They haven't dropped anything, they're extending the comment and review process.  They still intend to move forward with the ban.  Too many people are celebrating a victory when we haven't won yet.


This !!
Logged
Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.

Offline shooter

  • NFOA Full Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Aug 2013
  • Location: near Yutan
  • Posts: 1630
Re: ATF to reclassify armor piercing ammo
« Reply #105 on: March 10, 2015, 05:58:52 PM »
Quote from: FarmerRick on March 10, 2015, 05:48:04 PM
Like Andy said, this isn't over.  They haven't dropped anything, they're extending the comment and review process.  They still intend to move forward with the ban.  Too many people are celebrating a victory when we haven't won yet.
  they don't ever give up, they chip a little each time, they are willing to wait for what they want.
Logged
Was mich nicht umbringt macht mich stärker
Sic semper evello mortem tyrannis
 NRA Endowment member
  Shoot  them in the crotch.  Clint Smith, thunder ranch.  Oct 14, 2016

Offline DenmanShooter

  • NFOA Full Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Mar 2014
  • Location: Denman, Nebraska
  • Posts: 357
  • Fear No Evil
    • SolidRed
Re: ATF to reclassify armor piercing ammo
« Reply #106 on: March 10, 2015, 08:39:57 PM »
What he said ^^^^^
Logged
The golf course is a willful and deliberate misuse of a perfectly good rifle range!      Jeff  Cooper

Offline GreggL

  • NFOA Full Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Aug 2014
  • Posts: 153
Re: ATF to reclassify armor piercing ammo
« Reply #107 on: March 10, 2015, 08:51:42 PM »
Yesterday the Senate released a copy of the letter they are sending to the ATF. It appears that both
Sen. Sasse and Sen. Fischer signed the letter.
http://www.grassley.senate.gov/sites/default/files/judiciary/upload/Grassley%20letter%20to%20ATF%20regarding%20M855%20Ammunition.pdf
It basically states that when LEOPA was passed it exempted ammo used for
sporting purposes and the the ATF does not have the authority to ban M855.
Don't forget to thank your Senators for doing their job.
Logged
Government not being restrained by the Constitution as written is tyranny pure and simple.

Offline Husker_Fan

  • NFOA Full Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Apr 2010
  • Location: Omaha
  • Posts: 717
Re: ATF to reclassify armor piercing ammo
« Reply #108 on: March 10, 2015, 09:20:44 PM »
I wonder if some guy at the ATF had a bunch of M855 he wanted to sell on armslist.
Logged

Offline AAllen

  • NFOA Co-Founder
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2008
  • Posts: 4275
Re: ATF to reclassify armor piercing ammo
« Reply #109 on: March 10, 2015, 11:44:20 PM »
While many organizations are celebrating the putative victory in relation to the ATF’s announcement of earlier today that it would “not at this time seek to issue a final framework”, Firearms Industry Consulting Group (FICG), a division of Prince Law Offices, P.C., would caution our viewers and the Firearms Industry that ATF can likely, at any time, seek to move forward with a final framework without any further notice or comment.

More at: http://blog.princelaw.com/2015/03/10/celebrating-the-atfs-decision-regarding-ss109m855-ammunition-not-so-fast/
Logged

Offline Mali

  • NFOA Full Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Jan 2013
  • Posts: 1718
  • My life, my rights.
Re: ATF to reclassify armor piercing ammo
« Reply #110 on: March 11, 2015, 07:46:18 AM »
One risk we have right now is people see what just happened, breathe a sigh of relief and move on.  The ATF is not done and I expect we will have a short period of time then they will make another move on our ammo again.

Vigilance is never a waste of time.
Logged
Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn't pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same. - Ronald Reagan

Offline whatsit

  • Powder Benefactor
  • *
  • Join Date: May 2012
  • Location: Lincoln
  • Posts: 387
Re: ATF to reclassify armor piercing ammo
« Reply #111 on: March 12, 2015, 08:07:55 AM »


Reminder to keep watch.
Logged

Offline depserv

  • NFOA Full Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Oct 2011
  • Location: Omaha
  • Posts: 870
Re: ATF to reclassify armor piercing ammo
« Reply #112 on: March 12, 2015, 09:58:25 AM »
1 point for freedom, 0 points for tyranny.  Congratulations to all those who did what they could to resist this aggression.  Standing together we stopped it.  And thanks especially to our senators. 

To those who might think my use of the word tyranny is a little overboard I would point out that in today's world tyranny rarely comes rushing at you with a big ugly face holding s sign saying I am a tyrant; it comes instead in a thousand smiley-faced baby steps, every one as apparently mild as this one was.  So every one should be treated as the jackboot of a tyrant, even if it does seem small.

As has already been pointed out, it is unlikely that Obama's ATF is through with its mischief.  So we must all remember the old saying that eternal watchfulness is the price of freedom. 
Logged
The liberal cult seeks destruction of the American Republic like water seeks low ground.

Offline FarmerRick

  • NFOA Co-Founder
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2008
  • Location: Valley, NE
  • Posts: 3250
  • Antagonist of liberals, anti-hunters & hoplophobes
Re: ATF to reclassify armor piercing ammo
« Reply #113 on: March 12, 2015, 02:43:34 PM »
ATF raises new concerns about AR-15 ammo

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives on Thursday(3/12/15) raised new concerns about surplus military ammo used in popular AR-15 rifles and pistols just days after pulling back on a proposal to ban the ammo because it could threaten police safety.

In a Senate Appropriations Committee hearing, ATF Director B. Todd Jones said all types of the 5.56 military-style ammo used by shooters pose a threat to police as more people buy the AR-15-style pistols.

"Any 5.56 round" is "a challenge for officer safety," he said. Jones asked lawmakers to help in a review of a 1986 bill written to protect police from so-called "cop killer" rounds that largely exempted rifle ammo like the 5.56 because it has been used by target shooters, not criminals.


Read more at...  http://m.washingtonexaminer.com/atf-raises-new-worries-about-ar-15-ammo/article/2561422



If "any 5.56" is a challenge for officer safety, what about my .243 or my .45-70?
This is how they will attempt to disarm us all.  Tyranny is the correct term for what is happening, and anyone that doesn't see that has their head in the sand.
« Last Edit: March 12, 2015, 02:47:08 PM by FarmerRick »
Logged
Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.

Offline Mali

  • NFOA Full Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Jan 2013
  • Posts: 1718
  • My life, my rights.
Re: ATF to reclassify armor piercing ammo
« Reply #114 on: March 12, 2015, 03:09:25 PM »
Did I hear the bell for the next round?
That didn't take long.
Logged
Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn't pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same. - Ronald Reagan

Offline bkoenig

  • Gun Show Volunteer
  • Powder Benefactor
  • *
  • Join Date: May 2009
  • Location: Lincoln, NE
  • Posts: 3677
  • Aspiring cranky old gun nut
Re: ATF to reclassify armor piercing ammo
« Reply #115 on: March 12, 2015, 03:26:49 PM »
Well, at least they've admitted what they're after.  A total ammo ban.

Congress needs to defund the ATF.  Yesterday.
Logged

Offline RobertH

  • Gun Show Volunteer
  • Powder Benefactor
  • *
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Location: Norfolk
  • Posts: 2489
Re: ATF to reclassify armor piercing ammo
« Reply #116 on: March 12, 2015, 04:18:02 PM »
how's the NFOA comment coming?
Logged
Follow the NFOA on Twitter: @NFOA_Official

Offline RLMoeller

  • Sponsor- NFOA Firearm Raffle at the 2009 Big Buck Classic. 2010 Firearm Rights Champion Award winner
  • NFOA Full Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Location: La Vista, NE
  • Posts: 3058
Re: ATF to reclassify armor piercing ammo
« Reply #117 on: March 12, 2015, 04:32:40 PM »
Quote from: RobertH on March 12, 2015, 04:18:02 PM
how's the NFOA comment coming?
Was submitted earlier this week.
Logged

Offline FarmerRick

  • NFOA Co-Founder
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2008
  • Location: Valley, NE
  • Posts: 3250
  • Antagonist of liberals, anti-hunters & hoplophobes
Re: ATF to reclassify armor piercing ammo
« Reply #118 on: March 12, 2015, 04:36:55 PM »
Firearms Industry Consulting Group Files Comment in Opposition to ATF’s Proposed Framework for Determining Whether Certain Projectiles are “Primarily Intended for Sporting Purposes”

Quote
As many of our viewers are aware, Firearms Industry Consulting Group, a division of Prince Law Offices, P.C., has been following ATF’s proposed framework for determining whether certain projectiles are “primarily intended for sporting purposes” within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. 921(a)(17)(C). Today, we filed our formal Comment in opposition to ATF’s proposed framework. With exhibits, it is over 330 pages. You can download a copy at https://princelaw.files.wordpress.com/2015/03/ficg-sporting-purposes-ammo-comment-final-w-exhibits.pdf.

Read more here:  http://blog.princelaw.com/2015/03/12/ficg-files-comment-in-opposition-to-atfs-proposed-framework-for-determining-whether-certain-projectiles-are-primarily-intended-for-sporting-purposes/
Logged
Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.

Offline RobertH

  • Gun Show Volunteer
  • Powder Benefactor
  • *
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Location: Norfolk
  • Posts: 2489
Re: ATF to reclassify armor piercing ammo
« Reply #119 on: March 12, 2015, 04:55:20 PM »
Quote from: RLMoeller on March 12, 2015, 04:32:40 PM
Was submitted earlier this week.

Thank you.  Can we read it please?
Logged
Follow the NFOA on Twitter: @NFOA_Official
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7   Go Up
« previous next »