NFOA MEMBERS FORUM

General Categories => Firearms Training and Education => Topic started by: stutzcattle on February 10, 2013, 08:19:48 PM

Title: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: stutzcattle on February 10, 2013, 08:19:48 PM
My wife and 24 other people took a CCW class today lasting from 1000 to 1500.  I showed up when things were about done and stayed and drank a couple beers with the students after the instructor left.  Most of the people didn't understand anything about ccw or any methods of carry.

The range they used was not a range at all and was in no way safe.  I won't describe it, but no one I know would allow this for experienced shooters, let alone this group. 

I'm pretty disappointed with this guy.  It was $125/person and they received nothing other than their certification.  This was a football **** all the way around.  I understand a guy being compensated for his time, but he made well over $2500, sold a couple piece of **** guns and didn't help these folks at all.

The people that were the most disappointed were the women there.  And there were several.  They came with no experience and left with no education.  My wife asked me if that's how my class was.  It was not.   

I'm pretty disgusted and feel that this does not promote the concealed carry lifestyle.  If you're one of these instructors that is only in it for the money then shame on you.  You're gonna get someone killed. 

Please tell me that this isn't how this works now.  I understand the current craziness, but this is bull****.
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: bigdog on February 10, 2013, 09:17:13 PM
This wasn't like my class at all. My class time went form 8-5 with 30 minute working lunch and then went to the range the second day. I would take my class again just to do it.

bigdog
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: Dan W on February 10, 2013, 09:35:49 PM
I think the thing to do is report your wife's experience, and if you can get them to agree, her classmates,  and file a complaint with the Nebraska State Patrol.

The NSP oversees the certification of all instructors and the curriculum they must follow, as well as printed handout materials that I seem to remember were a requirement of the class.

There are many excellent instructors here in Nebraska that I am sure would not want their profession damaged by allowing a substandard class to continue unabated, not to mention the possible harm that could come to the students in an unsafe range setting
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: Gary on February 11, 2013, 04:02:40 AM
The 10am sounds familiar, our class this coming Sunday starts at 10am in Fairbury at the Law enforcement center.

Often times, life is what you make of it.  Lemons, lemonade.   I would be slow to put in negative feedback to the SP. 

No one got hurt, everybody learned something, moved forward.  Continuing education is ongoing, and daily.   

My last class on CC was over 30 years ago, put on by the sheriff in the sheriffs office in CB, IA.  Class room instruction only, no range time. 

The only thing I remember from that class, was they warned us never to shoot at abandoned cars, stuck in the mud in creeks, rivers.  The instructor said it was against the law to shoot any vehicle, abandoned or not. 

After the class this Sunday, the Coffee is on me!  I will return to this thread and give an assessment of our class.

I think this is a great topic of discussion of our expections for this class. What this Class is not, is 4 weeks at the Nebraska state patrol training academy.   It is also not a substitute for homework on your own before or after you take the class.

I would think our class time is going to be a good bit of instruction of what not to do as CCP holders. No John Wayne, Clint Eastwood antics. 

To be honest, i would prefer our state adopting laws like Vermont has. Everyone in Vermont may carry concealed if they choose to, as a legal resident of the state. Then if a town like Omaha wants to restrict that in some way, let the citizens of that community figure out what is best for them. Our system of government has way too many laws on the books.
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: abbafandr on February 11, 2013, 05:44:11 AM
My CCW class was a one day affair.  It started around 8:00  and lasted until almost 9:00PM.  One of the instructors was a lawyer who taught classes on legal aspects to OPD.  There was a lot of time spent on the legal ramifications of your actions.
Our range was a small private one, but we shot into a berm.  The most disconcerting thing to me was a good portion of the class acted as if this was the first time they had handled the weapon they were using.  If you don't know how to present your weapon or have one that regularly has malfunctions, I don't know what good it will do to have a permit.  But no complaints about the quality of the training from me.
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: Mudinyeri on February 11, 2013, 07:37:02 AM
Did you address your concerns with the instructor?  Personally, that would be my first line of approach.  The instructor, if made aware of your concerns, might offer you a bit of a refund or even some additional training.

I think there's a fairly wide variation in classes as you've seen from those who've already responded.  As I recall, my class started around 8:00 a.m. and went until about 2:00 p.m.  As I recall, there were about 15-20 students of all experience levels.  Having taught Hunter Safety classes for a while, I can attest that it's difficult to teach a class that fits the needs of everyone in the room.
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: bullit on February 11, 2013, 07:41:28 AM
As an instructor myself who is NOT in it for the money...my two cents. This "instructor" will hang himself at some point if his course is as poor as it sounds. His post course paperwork must include the number of hours in class and hours and the range. What you've stated will likely raise a red flag with NSP and he'll have his class audited. From personal experience I can't see how he could have covered the material AND ran 25 folks through the range 5 at a time per the regs in the time frame you listed.
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: Lorimor on February 11, 2013, 07:49:28 AM
Did you address your concerns with the instructor?  Personally, that would be my first line of approach.  The instructor, if made aware of your concerns, might offer you a bit of a refund or even some additional training.

I think there's a fairly wide variation in classes as you've seen from those who've already responded.  As I recall, my class started around 8:00 a.m. and went until about 2:00 p.m.  As I recall, there were about 15-20 students of all experience levels.  Having taught Hunter Safety classes for a while, I can attest that it's difficult to teach a class that fits the needs of everyone in the room.

I wouldn't want that job. :(  A class full of folk with widely varying backgrounds and experience.  Gotta be tough.

Flat out, the mandated CCW class isn't enough.  I believe the student must have some experience with operating a handgun safely and competently at the very least before attending the class and THEN, take even more training to keep up to snuff with legalities and dare I say, "advanced" stuff, like using a light. 

The problem is, good training isn't cheap.  Ammo isn't cheap.  But compared to making a legal boo-boo, that stuff IS cheap.

I don't want to see the state mandating minimums as I fear eventually that power will be abused to deny the "little people." 

A responsible attitude cannot be legislated nor can it be trained into a person.

It's a huge responsibility!  Get training!  I don't care how much Dad or Uncle Buck showed ya, it isn't enough.
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: Lorimor on February 11, 2013, 07:50:50 AM
As an instructor myself who is NOT in it for the money...my two cents. This "instructor" will hang himself at some point if his course is as poor as it sounds. His post course paperwork must include the number of hours in class and hours and the range. What you've stated will likely raise a red flag with NSP and he'll have his class audited. From personal experience I can't see how he could have covered the material AND ran 25 folks through the range 5 at a time per the regs in the time frame you listed.

You're just in it for the fame and glory.  (and to show off your Ho Chi Minh flip flops.)  :)
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: DaveB on February 11, 2013, 09:12:38 AM
If all the minimum requirements were met, there is nothing wrong with what was done.

I was fortunate in that we had an instructor that wanted to go farther than what was required. He did that on his own and let us know that where he was going was not required.

Just like everything in life, some are just better than others, just as long as they all at least provide the minimum necessary.
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: stutzcattle on February 11, 2013, 12:04:09 PM
I don't envy the guys that teach these classes.  This class ranged from a couple girls that started shooting a pistol 1 week ago up to guys that are 50 yrs old and have been shooting for a lifetime.   I wasn't there for much of it, basically just the last 30 minutes while they ran through the targets.  There was no berm, no safe area, and half the people didn't have holsters for their weapons. 

When they first scheduled this class the guy had 50 signed up and only reduced it to 25 after he got busted at a class a couple weeks ago for being way over his limit.   I'm not as concerned about anyone being taught all the ins and outs of CCW, I know it can't be done in one class.  My concern is with this being a pencil-whipped money generator.  I think it reflects poorly on all of us. 
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: ghknives on February 11, 2013, 12:27:15 PM
As an instructor I don't see how the minimum requirements could be met in that time period
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: FarmerRick on February 11, 2013, 12:50:52 PM
I feel that the NFOA as an orgainization should encourage safe CCW training that follows the State-mandated ciriculum.  This experience described does not seem to qualify as such.  While I feel that there should be NO PERMITS REQUIRED to carry openly or concealed, since we have a law that requires training and a permit, that's what needs to be followed at this time, BY LAW.


Stutz- I would encourage you to report you and your wife's experience to the State Patrol. If the instructor is making short-cuts in his training as you've described, he is doing a dis-service to his students and all those who come in contact with them.

Also just my opinion, but I beleive this so-called "instructor" should be named here in public to prevent him from taking advantage of any other unknowing potential customers.  I have a pretty good idea who it is, but will wait on making a guess.
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: wusker on February 11, 2013, 12:55:57 PM
My wife and I are trying to save for our CCW class costs right now, since Nebraska concealed carry training is booked till may it will be a bit for us that is where we are going, I have heared good things about these teachers.  I have a sense of taste so i wont ask for you to post it here but would you PM the name of the CCW training facility or teacher so I do not send my brother-in-law there or my sister they are planning on getting theirs soon also.
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: bullit on February 11, 2013, 01:12:10 PM
The fact that you noted holsters not being used tells me he has violated the draw from concealed requirement (unless he stupidly had them pulling from their pockets or waistband). Just as important is that the NSP can revoke all permits from his classes if determined he is not teaching the requirements.
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: Mudinyeri on February 11, 2013, 01:17:15 PM
I feel that the NFOA as an orgainization should encourage safe CCW training that follows the State-mandated ciriculum.  This experience described does not seem to qualify as such.  While I feel that there should be NO PERMITS REQUIRED to carry openly or concealed, since we have a law that requires training and a permit, that's what needs to be followed at this time, BY LAW.


Stutz- I would encourage you to report you and your wife's experience to the State Patrol. If the instructor is making short-cuts in his training as you've described, he is doing a dis-service to his students and all those who come in contact with them.

Also just my opinion, but I beleive this so-called "instructor" should be named here in public to prevent him from taking advantage of any other unknowing potential customers.  I have a pretty good idea who it is, but will wait on making a guess.

Before we start pulling out the pitchforks and torches ... let's think for a moment about the absence of details and first-hand information.  The OP admits that he was only around the the last 30 minutes or so of the class and is relying on characterizations from others (second-hand information).  The OP can speak authoritatively to the last 30 minutes of the class.  His wife could post her first-hand impressions of the class, but I'm hesitant to crucify someone publicly without more first-hand detail.

I do believe it would be entirely appropriate for the OP and his wife to go directly to the instructor and voice their concerns/complaints.  If those concerns/complaints are not addressed, then I think it would be appropriate to report the instructor's behavior to the State Police.
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: Phantom on February 11, 2013, 02:47:54 PM
Well I 'm taking My Class room part tonight

I'm taking my CCW Training from Professional Firearms Training.

So I'll be able to let anyone know on how good i think they are.
I am Ex-Military so I already know lots of what will be taught.

It will be interesting to learn what I don't know.

The Range part will be later this week conducted At the Bullet hole.
and it requires drawing from a holster (no Shoulder holsters for this part)

I know this from my brother who has already taken the CCW training through
them in the past.

It was him who recommended them to me for getting my required training.
two of their instructors are currently Omaha Police officers.

Except for the info from my brother there wasn't much info except where to be and what time for the class.

I would suggest that trainers make sure to give out all info like should you bring your gun and other equipment to the class room part or not. (the classroom  part is to be inside  Scheels)

I have some NFOA Flyers with me to hand out if anyone of them seems like they'd like more info about the NFOA.
So maybe I will be albe to hand some out tonight.
I should have gotten a T-shirt as well when i picking up the Flyers From Rod ( I just forgot he had them )
(Rod you need to Hang one up on your wall somewhere and thank you for the Flyers.)
 

I forgot to add a link their website is at
http://www.pftomaha.com/Home_Page.html (http://www.pftomaha.com/Home_Page.html)

If anyone is interested


Phantom

 
 
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: GreyGeek on February 11, 2013, 03:23:48 PM
I took my ccw class on Dec 9th, two months ago.    In the week before the class I looked up all relevant law on the Nebraska legislative website concerning ccw, open carry, where one could and could not carry, etc... and printed copies of the law.  I studied them before hand and I also took the printouts to class.   My  instructor handed out almost  the same identical printouts, and more.    Studying them beforehand gave me an advantage in class in that I knew what questions I should ask in advance.  On the test I got 30 right out of 30 questions.  His class time was packed with information and only a 10 minute pee break was given before we jumped back in.   There was no wasted time.  I would have ticked me off severely  if he had been redundant, wasted time telling tales, or appeared to be poorly  prepared or unprepared.

But, for me, where my instructor really shined was in the personal attention he and his partner gave to me during the range portion of the class.  It was like I was there in that indoor shooting range alone with them.  (If I had really been on top of MY game I would have made sure to pick up the 150 9MM brass casing I left on the floor.  I'm sure his partner got them!   ;D  BTW, anyone have any 9mm Luger casings they want to sell?).

As an LEO with about 30 years experience it showed.  He taught me exactly how to handle an interface with an  LEO while carrying.    I know exactly where I can and can't carry, and the questions I had were answered.     And while I had a lot of previous experience shooting rifles and shotguns, and use to carry  a 9mm while a deputy marshal for a couple years in a small village in central Nebraska, that was  40 years  ago.    Proper handling of a hand gun was demonstrated very well, and the mistakes I made on the range received instant and sharp  rebukes, especially about keeping one's finger off the trigger while pulling the  weapon out of the holster and until one decides  to shoot. And, watching out for muzzle sweep or potential collateral damage to unintended downrange targets.    He checked out my IWB holster, its position, and how well it gripped the weapon, and how easy it was to pull the weapon.  All questions  I was concerned about before the class.    He also checked out my weapon thoroughly.   I had 3 FTE's and was wondering if it was my fault or the gun's fault.  He immediately corrected my grip ("limp wrist" problem) and the next 135 rounds never gave me another FTE.

I plan to take more classes from Craig and his partner later on, after I spend some time on the range.  While I had only one bullet out of 150 outside the kill zone, a shoulder hit,  I want to be more accurate than that.    I want the first shot to be within a 5" diameter circle from  2 yards to 20 yards, and in a 9" circle at 50 yards.    So, I got lots of practice ahead of me.   That's why I've purchased a reloader and necessary equipment (but my ccw ammo will be commercial).

One interesting tidbit I learned was that one can prevent the discharge of a second round in a semi-auto pistol by holding the rack when the first round is discharged.   I never would have believed it if I hadn't seen his partner demonstrate it.
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: JTH on February 11, 2013, 03:25:06 PM
Before we start pulling out the pitchforks and torches ... let's think for a moment about the absence of details and first-hand information.
[snip]
I do believe it would be entirely appropriate for the OP and his wife to go directly to the instructor and voice their concerns/complaints.  If those concerns/complaints are not addressed, then I think it would be appropriate to report the instructor's behavior to the State Police.


Looking at this, there are really two viewpoints here:

Instructor's viewpoint:
The state class isn't a technique class---students should come into the class knowing how to draw from a holster, aim, and shoot accurately at a target from various (fairly close) distances.  (The max distance is 21 feet, so it isn't like the accuracy requirements are particularly onerous.)

They need to be able to do all of the previous in a safe fashion, obeying the standard rules of gun safety.  They should come in with the appropriate gear--a firearm, magazines, and a holster and clothing that can conceal it. All of those are required by the qualification--and the course itself is NOT there to teach the required gun handling. 

The curriculum is required to include some shooting basics, plus practice---but it really isn't supposed to be a technique course.  Students should already know how to shoot.

At some point in time, the State Patrol will be adding me to the list of state CCW instructors (just waiting for their final approval) --- and if a student shows up to my class unable to be safe, or without appropriate equipment, they'll have to come back to another class later.

The state class really is about information---laws, regulations, and requirements.   Conflict resolution, understanding the basics of use of force--information to keep yourself from making a mistake and ending up in prison yourself.  Previous shooting experience won't really give you any help for this, either--because most of the class isn't about shooting technique.  (Hardly any is about shooting technique.) 

Most of it is about _when_ you can shoot---and more importantly, when you shouldn't.  As such, unless you've already had self-defense and use of force training, pay attention!  :)


Student's viewpoint:
Five hours isn't a lot--especially if there was a break for lunch in the middle.  Looking at what is required for the state curriculum, I don't see any way to cover all of that plus the range requirement (for 25 people?!) in five hours.  I certainly couldn't do it--not and have anyone learn anything.

Covered that quickly, I'm betting that most of it just whizzed by with just barely enough sticking well enough so that people could pass the test.  (I'm also betting that there was a lot of "this will be on the test, so remember it!" commentary.)

As for range commentary--it doesn't have to be a commercial range, or really anything more than an open area with safe directions and a backstop.  That being said--if it wasn't safe, then that isn't right.  The state patrol regs specifically state:  "A firing range means a location operated and maintained for public or private shooting sports and designed to keep fired rounds within a berm or backstop."  If there wasn't a berm or a backstop, or something similar for safe fire, then there's a problem.

If some people shot and passed the range test without a holster (and thus, not from concealment) then it wasn't a valid range qualification.  In addition, if there was only one instructor with more than 5 students on the line at a time, then that is also an issue. State Patrol regs:  "Range/practical exercises - 1 instructor to 5 students."




…so like everyone else, I think the OP and the student should contact the instructor and give feedback, and hopefully receive clarification. 

If said clarification is insufficient, then contacting the State Patrol and making an official report would be the next step.

Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: greg58 on February 11, 2013, 05:15:19 PM
My son and I took CHP training a couple of years ago at Great Plains Rifle LLC. near Bruno NE, near Abie NE. In other words, near nothing but farmland. The rural atmosphere contributed to a relaxing day.
The class was well prepared, covered what the Statute requires, the class size was 12 people max. the setting was in a small gun store where you could buy ammo if you didn't bring enough, and the shooting portion was right out the back of the store to a small range.
The 2 instructors are husband and wife and are retired NSP, tuition included pizza lunch, the training was not hurried, and I really felt the shooting portion was handled safely.
Call this a shameless plug, but we were very satisfied.

Greg58

http://greatplainsllc.com/ccwtraining.aspx (http://greatplainsllc.com/ccwtraining.aspx)
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: Gary on February 11, 2013, 08:00:08 PM
As the paperwork gets filed to get the licenses, having 50 people all claim the same date, time, and instructor would be pretty odious.  How could you run 50 people through a target range, and have class instruction, all in one day with one guy teaching the class???  I think this was misunderstood by you over the beers??? & you stated YOU did not take the class.

What we need is calm heads as we watch Obama and his minions try to strip us of all our Second Amendments privileges.  Having to obtain a CCP is an infringement on my rights already, and having an open discussion from persons sitting at a bar spill out onto this forum serves us how exactly???

If the husband wants his money back for the class, I am sure the instructor would be glad to do that for you.   If on the other hand, you are using the certification gleaned from taking that class, I am guessing any refund would be having your cake and eating it too.

My class is this Sunday, and by chance, your instructor, is my instructor, I will learn all I can, and pay my inappropriate tax to the gov for a privilege the 2nd Amendment already granted me, on December 15, 1791

 


I don't envy the guys that teach these classes.  This class ranged from a couple girls that started shooting a pistol 1 week ago up to guys that are 50 yrs old and have been shooting for a lifetime.   I wasn't there for much of it, basically just the last 30 minutes while they ran through the targets.  There was no berm, no safe area, and half the people didn't have holsters for their weapons. 

When they first scheduled this class the guy had 50 signed up and only reduced it to 25 after he got busted at a class a couple weeks ago for being way over his limit.   I'm not as concerned about anyone being taught all the ins and outs of CCW, I know it can't be done in one class.  My concern is with this being a pencil-whipped money generator.  I think it reflects poorly on all of us. 
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: bullit on February 11, 2013, 08:29:22 PM
Gary we look forward to your report...just make certain you at least get a badge if your disappointed
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: Chris Z on February 11, 2013, 09:28:31 PM
I can assure you this wasn't my class....... We take about a 9 hour day (3 of which are spent on the range). There is no possible way to run 25 people through the class properly and meet the required objectives in 5 hours..... This Instructor makes us all look bad and NSP needs to know about this...........

There was another Instructor recently who was doing an incredible half ass job on the range, allowing unsafe, uncontrolled gun handling all over the place, not following any bit of his submitted plan and did not even know the state required range qualification...... It wasn't real humorous for him when NSP showed up to audit his class.



Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: NB on February 11, 2013, 09:41:36 PM
I was at Scheel's Omaha tonight.  I suppose I learned a thing or two but it was mostly common sense stuff.  Was the class good or bad?  I don't know.  I have been to a total of one, and the reason I went is so I could get my permit.  If I get a permit, then the class has served it's purpose.  The only disappointment is that this class didn't add on the Utah kicker, which I wasn't aware of when I signed up.

Hapkido has it right.  If your expectation is to learn how to properly handle a firearm, then CCW is not the right forum.  You should already know that before you show up.  Furthermore, if your expectation is to learn the "legality" of conceal carry, then I guess you can learn a little bit, but what I got out of it is that there is so much grey area that legality is never black and white.  6 hours of "what-if" scenarios would not have made it any clearer.

At the end of the day, I'm not getting my panties in a bunch over some noob getting a CCW permit that doesn't deserve one.  This class is the means to the end, which is that slip of paper the state patrol gives to me.
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: Gary on February 11, 2013, 11:58:09 PM
Don't think I will go for a badge, but as a joke, I could tell my wife she HAS TO WEAR ONE, and drive with her 4 way flashers on, while she has a concealed weapon in her car!  lol  She is pretty gullible, even after 30 years of marriage to me.   I think all people with good hearts are gullible.


Gary we look forward to your report...just make certain you at least get a badge if your disappointed
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: Gary on February 12, 2013, 12:07:30 AM
For my class, I hope and pray, no audit takes place, as I really just want to get this infringement of my Second Amendment rights, over and done with.

I have owned guns so long, my first riffle was $18, and my first handgun was $29, if that tells you anything.  Long time ago.

My first CCP was 30 years ago, no, longer.  Maybe 35 years ago.   I am sure much has changed, but mostly the politics of it all. 

My wife has never handled many guns, shot her first handgun this week, bless her heart, she did real good.

My hope for this class, is it follows the path of least resistance, and is over and done with in the minimum time allowed by state law, no one is injured, no one flunks, and lunch is served with Mt. Dew. 

When it is over, I will not complain, gripe, or fuss, as long as the goal is achieved, of this being over.

I have been a life member of NRA from 1991.  I am a retired gun dealer.  In all my years of dealing guns, no surprises, no big moments, and I would like to keep it that way. 


I can assure you this wasn't my class....... We take about a 9 hour day (3 of which are spent on the range). There is no possible way to run 25 people through the class properly and meet the required objectives in 5 hours..... This Instructor makes us all look bad and NSP needs to know about this...........

There was another Instructor recently who was doing an incredible half ass job on the range, allowing unsafe, uncontrolled gun handling all over the place, not following any bit of his submitted plan and did not even know the state required range qualification...... It wasn't real humorous for him when NSP showed up to audit his class.




Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: Gary on February 12, 2013, 12:12:40 AM
Very good post, or at least, it rang my bell.  My feelings exactly!

If I move my business to Vermont, do you know what I need to do to carry a Concealed Weapon on my person?  Nothing.  Why is Nebraska so afraid of a US citizen exercising my rights to a complete and straight forward Second Amendment?


I was at Scheel's Omaha tonight.  I suppose I learned a thing or two but it was mostly common sense stuff.  Was the class good or bad?  I don't know.  I have been to a total of one, and the reason I went is so I could get my permit.  If I get a permit, then the class has served it's purpose.  The only disappointment is that this class didn't add on the Utah kicker, which I wasn't aware of when I signed up.

Hapkido has it right.  If your expectation is to learn how to properly handle a firearm, then CCW is not the right forum.  You should already know that before you show up.  Furthermore, if your expectation is to learn the "legality" of conceal carry, then I guess you can learn a little bit, but what I got out of it is that there is so much grey area that legality is never black and white.  6 hours of "what-if" scenarios would not have made it any clearer.

At the end of the day, I'm not getting my panties in a bunch over some noob getting a CCW permit that doesn't deserve one.  This class is the means to the end, which is that slip of paper the state patrol gives to me.
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: DaveB on February 12, 2013, 12:13:09 AM
My son and I took CHP training a couple of years ago at Great Plains Rifle LLC. near Bruno NE, near Abie NE. In other words, near nothing but farmland. The rural atmosphere contributed to a relaxing day.
The class was well prepared, covered what the Statute requires, the class size was 12 people max. the setting was in a small gun store where you could buy ammo if you didn't bring enough, and the shooting portion was right out the back of the store to a small range.
The 2 instructors are husband and wife and are retired NSP, tuition included pizza lunch, the training was not hurried, and I really felt the shooting portion was handled safely.
Call this a shameless plug, but we were very satisfied.

Greg58

http://greatplainsllc.com/ccwtraining.aspx (http://greatplainsllc.com/ccwtraining.aspx)
Same place we went, was an awesome job, friendly, and knew what they were talking about.
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: Phantom on February 12, 2013, 10:56:11 AM
I also was at the Class given at Scheel's here in Omaha Last night

Our Class was taught By Larry Moody

I have to echo others here in this forum it was not a beginner level class
It assumes that the student has at least a very general familiarity with guns and gun usage.

Our class touched On federal, state and a bit on local laws in regards to conceded carry and gun ownership, as well as some of the responsibility's associated with each.

He actually demonstrated several Role playing scenario's too.

he went into handgun types and had examples of both that he passed around for the class to examine

he went through a bit on round care and inspection as well as handling safety and some hazards associated with handling the rounds/(bullets) 

I thought he was a very approachable instructor and was very willing to answer questions regarding a wide range of questions relating to class materials.

The class size was about 20 to 22 people.  (sorry i didn't think to count heads at the time)

At the End of the Classroom Section we all took the (I what i was told was the States) 30 question test. 
It appeared to me that everyone there at least passed the test.

I was supprised that the Range part will not be held at the Bullet hole like their web site says but will be at a private location near 192 and state street.

It will be conducted over 3 days this week.

He seemed to be very knowledgeable and very willing to share that knowledge with the class.
the only point he seemed to be unaware of was the State requirement of 45 days for approving or denying a CCW permit.  he quoted that times were running about 68 days to process them.

I informed him about the requirement or 45 day under State law but did say that some times the people working in the State patrol offices may be unaware of this requirement under state law.       

I was actually very pleasantly supprised by the level of knowledge I've gained here in the forum in regards to Nebraska state CCW laws, regulations and requirement's associated with it.

I would be willing to recommend Larry to others for training as i thought he did a very good job presenting the info and engaging the class he was very humorous and told several funny story's and tales that were related to the class material at the time.

This is the first time i've actual attempted to write a review on any subect so i hope that I've done a resonable and factual job on it. 


thanks
Phantom
 

     
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: bullit on February 12, 2013, 11:18:25 AM
A REAL HELPFUL resource I would refer EVERYONE with questions about the course they have taken or will take is the NSP website which has all pertinent information as well as what instructors are required to teach in the class and the range.  I know most of here are men and reading instructions/directions is foreign to us. An example would be the following:

027 TRAINING COURSE CONTENT

027.01 The instructor of a Handgun Training and Safety Course is required to provide a Handgun Training and Safety Course Lesson Plan to Nebraska State Patrol. Before it can be used, the Lesson Plan must meet the minimum standards for the course and be approved by the Nebraska State Patrol. Significant deviation from a lesson plan is unacceptable and will result in the revocation of the instructor’s certification. Additionally, deviations may result in rejection of student’s permit application.
027.02 The following will be the minimum information instructed to the participants of any Handgun Training and Safety Course. Any training above and beyond the Lesson Plan is the sole responsibility of the instructor. An instructor may supplement the Lesson Plan but may not teach material which is inconsistent with the plan.
027.03 The minimum safety and training requirements for a Handgun Training and Safety Course shall include, but not be limited to:
027.03A Knowledge of ways to avoid a criminal attack and to defuse or control a violent confrontation;
027.03B Knowledge and safe handling of a handgun;
027.03C Knowledge and safe handling of handgun ammunition;
027.03D Knowledge of proper storage practices for handguns and ammunition, including storage practices which would reduce the possibility of accidental injury to a child;
027.03E Safe handgun shooting fundamentals;
027.03F Knowledge of federal, state, and local laws pertaining to the purchase, ownership, transportation, and possession of handguns;
027.03G Knowledge of federal, state, and local laws pertaining to the use of a handgun, including, but not limited to, use of a handgun for self-defense and laws relating to justifiable homicide and the various degrees of assault;
027.04 Applicants must demonstrate competency in handling and shooting a handgun with respect to the minimum safety and training requirements;
027.04A Students shall complete practical exercises which include practice shooting on the range. These exercises will include but are not limited to the following; drawing and firing drills, precision shooting drills, and decision making (shoot-don’t
23
shoot) drills. The number of rounds to be fired in practice by each student will be determined by the instructor.
027.04B The Nebraska State Patrol shall set the qualification course for the demonstration of competency. The course shall be 30 rounds with varying distances. The target used shall be the FBI “Q” target. A score of 70 percent will be the minimum to demonstrate competency. Participants in the Handgun Training and Safety Course will be allowed three attempts to demonstrate competency, meeting the minimum standards.
027.04C Qualification Course
Distance Number of Rounds Time limit
3 feet Six (6) N/A
** Two rounds per command to fire. One (1) repetition must be from a concealed draw**
9 feet Twelve (12) N/A
** Two rounds per command to fire. Three (3) repetitions must be from a concealed draw**
15 feet Six (6) N/A
** Two rounds per command to fire. One (1)) repetition must be from a concealed draw**
21 feet Six (6) N/A
** Two rounds per command to fire. One (1) repetition must be from a concealed draw**
027.05 Applicants must take a written test consisting of a minimum of 30 questions. The Nebraska State Patrol will provide the test questions. A score of 70 percent will be the minimum passing score.
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: GreyGeek on February 12, 2013, 11:39:19 AM
Interesting, bullit!
I can put a check mark beside each bullet point for my training.   I thought the range portion was very good.
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: stutzcattle on February 12, 2013, 05:34:22 PM
I can assure you this wasn't my class....... We take about a 9 hour day (3 of which are spent on the range). There is no possible way to run 25 people through the class properly and meet the required objectives in 5 hours..... This Instructor makes us all look bad and NSP needs to know about this...........

There was another Instructor recently who was doing an incredible half ass job on the range, allowing unsafe, uncontrolled gun handling all over the place, not following any bit of his submitted plan and did not even know the state required range qualification...... It wasn't real humorous for him when NSP showed up to audit his class.




I took my class with you about five years ago.  I remember it lasting all day.  This is what struck me. 

I'm posting this not to hurt some instructor or to see him audited.  I also feel that we should have constitutional carry. 
I'm concerned that some of these people are out there simply to generate money right now.  I'm a capitalist and believe in making as much as possible.  But...If you're gonna charge the same amt as the guy that's teaching 4 more hours and covering twice as much info you're doing a disservice to the students.  I think this guy making $3k on one class is fine.   If he does everything he's supposed to. 

I'm not going to bring this to the SP's attention.  I don't want 25 armed people looking for me.  Firearms safety is something they should know or be in the process of learning.  That's all that should really matter anyway.
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: stutzcattle on February 13, 2013, 04:11:57 PM
Is there a time requirement for these classes?
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: JTH on February 13, 2013, 05:10:06 PM
Is there a time requirement for these classes?

No....BUT the instructor must cover the mandated material given in the State Patrol regulations.

So if the teacher has any shred of self-respect, there is a certain minimum time in class required. 

And, IN MY OPINION, there is no way to do anything remotely resembling a good job in a 5-hour class where that 5 hours includes range time.
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: Phantom on February 13, 2013, 05:28:14 PM
Well i Finished my class today

I only did one rookie mistake on the range (it wasn't a safety violation at least)
I used my brothers Xd40 to do the range part and had never fired it before.
I know I'm going to get no end of grief from the mistake I made.
I misplaced my left thumb when i first fired it.
Yea It bit me ...cut my thumb ....no big deal it just bled .....
I shot the rest of the rounds in the mag..then got a paper towel to wrap my thumb
and shot the rest of the course no problem.

all done and passed.
I was sure happy to be using a .40 rather then a 9mm like everyone else was as ammo was much easier to find for it.  ;D

All done with that part course finished now.
Now i just need to finish filling out the paperwork and visit a notary
then take it and my fee out to the Highway patrol office and get finger printed again.
Submit it all and pay the fee.
Then comes the 45 day wait.
I'll get it done this week or sometime next week at the latest.


Phantom
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: Gary on February 13, 2013, 06:55:03 PM
Glad your thumb did not go flying across the room.  Some woman taking pole dancing lessons lost a thumb!  ouch. 
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: Jutty on February 13, 2013, 08:51:26 PM
the only point he seemed to be unaware of was the State requirement of 45 days for approving or denying a CCW permit.  he quoted that times were running about 68 days to process them.

I informed him about the requirement or 45 day under State law but did say that some times the people working in the State patrol offices may be unaware of this requirement under state law.       

I am sure they are very aware of it (by people calling and asking where their permit is). The big issue is, by this law, what is the penalty to NSP if they DON'T get it done in 45 days?

Hint: There is none...
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: LM4202 on February 23, 2013, 12:54:56 AM
I took Chris Z's class and its just fine.  The CHP class is NOT a beginners class.  The students should have that down before even taking the CHP course.     
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: Lorimor on February 23, 2013, 08:21:07 AM

I was actually very pleasantly supprised by the level of knowledge I've gained here in the forum in regards to Nebraska state CCW laws, regulations and requirement's associated with it.

Some pretty knowledgeable folks here.  I urge you to take advantage of that and take their classes. 

Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: zofoman on February 23, 2013, 10:30:42 AM
The CHP class is NOT a beginners class.  The students should have that down before even taking the CHP course.     

This is true.   Granted, people have to start somewhere....learning basic handgun skills at a CCW class is not the place.  There are many places one can get the basics down in a safe and knowledgeable manner before moving on.    Even though I live in Lincoln, I did my CCW class at 88-Tactical as did my oldest son....followed up by the Utah permit session at a later date.    Jason Wright was the instructor for both.  Their classes are held in one day or two day sessions....depending.   And they are full days, no quick in/out stuff and with limited attendance so as to better manage & effectively teach the classes.   The facility they have at Tekamah is outstanding.  I took my classroom session at their offices in Omaha whereas the range portion was at Tekamah.   My oldest son has followed up by taking many of their continued training courses as well.   My youngest son recently completed his CCW at Big Shots and in our three-way discussion/comparing what was taught by the two different venues we concluded that both were excellent...but, would give the edge to 88-Tactical because of the "extra" training/scenarios/responses.   If you are not familiar with these folks, they just launched a new website... http://88tactical.com/ (http://88tactical.com/)    They offer a variety of different classes for beginners, ladies only, tactical and my personal favorite, "Guardian Series" of training for children...ie: Anti Bully/ Anti Abduction Course.   My two grandchildren (F/age 10 & M/age 6) took the "Fast Cats" course and it was well worth it based on what I saw from the videos that my son recorded.   
     
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: stutzcattle on April 25, 2013, 04:37:44 PM
There's been talk that this instructor had a ND in his class last sunday.  He was demonstrating all the different methods of carry and pulled a .22 out of his pocket and shot a hole in the roll up door in the shop he was in. 
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: OnTheFly on April 25, 2013, 05:35:09 PM
There's been talk that this instructor had a ND in his class last sunday.  He was demonstrating all the different methods of carry and pulled a .22 out of his pocket and shot a hole in the roll up door in the shop he was in. 

Was this in Lincoln?

Fly
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: stutzcattle on April 25, 2013, 07:38:16 PM
This was in Geneva.  I'm waiting on a guy that was "actually" there to call me back.
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: stutzcattle on April 25, 2013, 08:51:56 PM
Just verified the story with one of the 13 guys that were in the class. The guy I talked to was sitting about 8 ft away from the instructor when it happend. He initially thought it was a blank and part of the training until the instructor turned red and they all noticed the hole 2" above the floor in the roll up door. The instructor did not address the ND or point it out to anyone. He continued on. My guy also says that he read the material as fast as possible and was barely understandable. They started at 1030 and were all out of there by 1430. That included a 30 minute lunch break.
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: Dan W on April 25, 2013, 08:54:57 PM
Hopefully no one gets injured or killed before this guy is shut down
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: OnTheFly on April 25, 2013, 09:06:29 PM
This was in Geneva.  I'm waiting on a guy that was "actually" there to call me back.

Okay.  Just wondering because someone posted about a ND at BigShots in Lincoln during a CHP class too.  Wondered if you were talking about the same thing.

Fly
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: Gary on April 25, 2013, 09:41:45 PM
Before we throw the baby out with the bath water, with any Unintentional Discharge we hear about, we should not jump to conclusions of what happened, IMHO.   It would be great of these people would log on here, and tell about what happened in these cases.  Don't see that happening.
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: stutzcattle on April 25, 2013, 09:45:21 PM
Gary...I'm telling you what happend.  You need to decide which side of the gun world you're on.  This guy is an idiot and does not deserve to be teaching anyone anything.  I agree with you that there should be no restrictions on carrying a gun.  But, there is, and as long as there is we should make sure that those people in leadership positions are not morons. 

This is an issue that I expect this group to deal with.  I can't think of a more important issue for this group.
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: HuskerXDM on April 25, 2013, 09:51:17 PM
When people have concerns they should email or call Sgt. Craig Loveless.  Someone who witnessed this first hand should make the contact or it is just heresy.  Just the fact that he damaged someone else's property should require  a report within 10 days anyway. 

Sgt. Loveless's contact info is on the Nebraska State Patrol website.
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: FarmerRick on April 25, 2013, 10:03:41 PM
Maybe ol' Bruce should have just taken one of these out of his pocket(like  the ones he sells on his website and at gun shows) and stuck it right over the hole in that freshly ventilated door.   I wonder how good they are at stopping bleeding...

(http://www.areagency.com/uploads/4/8/8/5/4885312/7293256.jpg)
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: Dan W on April 25, 2013, 10:09:14 PM
Just the fact that he damaged someone else's property should require  a report within 10 days anyway. 

I am assuming this instructor actually has a CHP, but yes that is a requirement any time a permit holder discharges a round outside of a range

Quote
What am I supposed to do if my concealed weapon injures someone or damages property?     

You must report any injury to a person or damage to property resulting from the discharge of a concealed handgun you carry to the Nebraska State Patrol within ten (10) days of the incident. Failure to file the report is a criminal offense. The form for making such a report will be available on the Nebraska State Patrol website at and can be downloaded for your use in complying with this requirement.

Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: ILoveCats on April 25, 2013, 10:22:03 PM
Maybe ol' Bruce should have just taken one of these out of his pocket(like  the ones he sells on his website and at gun shows) and stuck it right over the hole in that freshly ventilated door.   I wonder how good they are at stopping bleeding...

(http://www.areagency.com/uploads/4/8/8/5/4885312/7293256.jpg)

A "CHP badge"?  That's just sad.    :-[
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: stutzcattle on April 25, 2013, 10:38:11 PM
http://www.areagency.com/ (http://www.areagency.com/)
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: HuskerXDM on April 25, 2013, 11:09:04 PM
I overheard a couple at Scheels saying they attended a CHP class that lasted an hour and a half and the instructor was out of Fairbury.  Not sure if this is the same guy or not.
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: stutzcattle on April 25, 2013, 11:43:59 PM
OK, who is Sgt. Loveless and where is his contact info?
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: OnTheFly on April 25, 2013, 11:54:21 PM
OK, who is Sgt. Loveless and where is his contact info?

https://nsp.state.ne.us/FindFile.asp?ID=1550 (https://nsp.state.ne.us/FindFile.asp?ID=1550)
308.385.6030 ext 319
craig.loveless@nebraska.gov

Fly
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: metaldoc on April 26, 2013, 10:33:27 AM
OK, who is Sgt. Loveless and where is his contact info?

Please keep us informed of developments.
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: RLMoeller on April 26, 2013, 10:55:42 AM
To expand on the information already given on how to contact Sgt Loveless . . . .   He is tasked with administering the NE CHP program.  He is the point of contact for all CHP instructors.
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: hangarflying on May 13, 2013, 10:24:41 PM
Has the NFOA considered some kind of program to audit classes to give them a "NFOA Stamp of Approval"? Those that get a "normal" stamp adequately meet the minimum requirements while those with a "gold" stamp exceed the minimum requirements. I'm late to the conversation, so I don't know if this has been discussed already.
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: OnTheFly on May 13, 2013, 10:31:49 PM
Has the NFOA considered some kind of program to audit classes to give them a "NFOA Stamp of Approval"? Those that get a "normal" stamp adequately meet the minimum requirements while those with a "gold" stamp exceed the minimum requirements. I'm late to the conversation, so I don't know if this has been discussed already.

No, that has not been discussed to my knowledge.  Interesting idea.

Welcome to the NFOA by the way.

Fly
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: Lorimor on May 14, 2013, 08:54:35 AM
See below.  ND on the mouse.  :)
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: Lorimor on May 14, 2013, 08:56:57 AM
Though my ops aren't very black, I have been known to operate somewhat covertly.  Therefore, I am nominating myself as an independent CCW class auditor.  This won't be an inexpensive undertaking however.  :(  It will take massive amounts of money for me to live in the style I have been accustomed to.  And don't forget, ammo is increasingly expensive.  As anyone can tell you, I'm a big fan of the spray and pray technique.  I tend to shoot a lot.  It makes me feel good.

Yes, I am willing to make the sacrifice and provide this much needed and vital service. 

Please send your very large and extremely generous donations early and often to the Lorimor Fan Club. 



Um... oops? :)
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: dcjulie on May 14, 2013, 10:21:35 AM
It really saddens me to hear about classes like this.  We took Chris Z's class several years ago and it was excellent.  It was a LONG day, but any day in a classroom is long.  He took the time to go over the required material, and we got a copy of all the statutes to take home.

We also submitted our curriculum to the NSP in January and are awaiting approval to be instructors.  The requirements are detailed and significant!  I can't believe anyone would be able to cover that much material in < 8 hours.  The fact that there are instructors out there doing just that is a shame.  If you are not willing to teach the requirements, don't teach!  I don't fault the students in this situation, but these instructors need to be evaluated by the NSP and their classes altered or their instructor approval revoked.  They make ALL OF US look bad!
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: SeanN on May 14, 2013, 11:13:29 AM
http://www.areagency.com/ (http://www.areagency.com/)

I really hope this is a joke.
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: dcjulie on May 14, 2013, 11:57:47 AM
Unfortunately, I don't think so.
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: RLMoeller on May 14, 2013, 12:01:43 PM
Not a joke.  I've seen him peddling the badges and pot metal guns at the shows.
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: bullit on May 14, 2013, 12:10:29 PM
"Badges.....we don't need no stinkin' badges...  we got our Jimenez's ...."
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: SeanN on May 14, 2013, 12:38:40 PM
That's just complete clown shoes.

And the scenario he outlines on that website is ridiculous. Because apparently making the fast movement to get your badge and show it to the cop isn't going to make him shoot you!  ::)
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: bullit on May 14, 2013, 01:57:00 PM
I think Farmer Rick has a badge or two.... :P
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: Gary on May 14, 2013, 02:46:05 PM
I would remind my fellow NFOA members, litigation comes in many forms, and forums.   Like some of our grandparents taught the fortunate among us, if you have something good to say.......

If you have taken his class, then I think you can add your perspective on what was done and said.  If you have not, yet you wish to run down his business, well, that is deep water you are swimming in.

I took Bruce's class, and while I think there are things that could have been done better, every class could find things to improve upon.

 I have two Don Larson classes (so far), a well respected NRA Instructor & Training Counselor, and he did not enter nor leave the classes, walking on water.   People are people, and if the State Patrol has given their credentials to someone to teach CHP classes in Nebraska, that would seem to be in their hands.

Who here would like to poke fun at the NRA for selling a Concealed Carry ID holder, that looks very much like what Bruce is selling, only with a NRA twist to it? 

(http://www.nrastore.com/nrastore/images/detail/22582ps.jpg)


(http://www.nrastore.com/nrastore/images/additional/22582AVPS2.jpg)

It is not your ID holder, seal on it, badge, gun you carry, or the car you drive.  It is not about all that baggage.  It is about how you stand in your own shoes that really says who you are. 
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: dcjulie on May 14, 2013, 05:46:40 PM
Gary - the requirements for teaching the NSP class are specific.  This guy teaching the thing in 4 hours can not possibly be covering the mandatory requirements in any way that are beneficial. 

I have personally been told by students from some classes that they didn't learn a thing (I don't know who the instructor was).  They went in, got a copy of the test, was told what the answers were, threw some rounds downrange and were told they "passed."  They were not comfortable with the laws, nor carrying a concealed hand gun.  They paid >$100 for the class, and felt they got nothing out of it.  I encouraged them to take their concerns to the NSP, and they were afraid to do so.  They said that they did not want to "get anyone in trouble" but came to me to learn about CCW and shooting.

The goal of instructors should be to TEACH students, not merely make money and crank out CCW permits!

As to your defense of the "badges" - okay.  I think the NRA ones are ridiculous too!
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: zofoman on May 14, 2013, 09:41:13 PM
Regarding the CWP badges.....for what purpose do they serve and furthermore who are you going to "flash" that ridiculous looking thing to?   

I for one think that if a person flashed one of those babies around, that simple act could be misinterpreted for impersonation of law enforcement.    Not a good position to be in.    There endeth the lesson.

But, back on topic....anyone wishing to take a CCW class really needs to do their homework first and ask/look around (such as here on this forum) as to where to get the most/best training for one's hard earned dollars and not let the simple price aspect drive the results.   
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: ghknives on May 15, 2013, 10:06:08 AM
The general public doesn't realize the difference between a good and poor instructor. Most are shopping for best price, least time and smallest ammo expenditure. Unfortunately, the difference could mean hundreds of thousands of dollars, lengthy prison sentences or worse
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: Gary on May 15, 2013, 02:37:17 PM
Gary - the requirements for teaching the NSP class are specific.  This guy teaching the thing in 4 hours can not possibly be covering the mandatory requirements in any way that are beneficial. 

I have personally been told by students from some classes that they didn't learn a thing (I don't know who the instructor was).  They went in, got a copy of the test, was told what the answers were, threw some rounds downrange and were told they "passed."  They were not comfortable with the laws, nor carrying a concealed hand gun.  They paid >$100 for the class, and felt they got nothing out of it.  I encouraged them to take their concerns to the NSP, and they were afraid to do so.  They said that they did not want to "get anyone in trouble" but came to me to learn about CCW and shooting.

The goal of instructors should be to TEACH students, not merely make money and crank out CCW permits!

As to your defense of the "badges" - okay.  I think the NRA ones are ridiculous too!

I can hint a storm is coming, but I cannot pull you guys out of the rain. 

As for me showing a defense of badges, hardly.  I was just showing that offering by NRA.  NRA sells socks also, haven't purchased any (yet) lol

 I keep my ID in my cellphone case.  Never go anywhere without that.   

I ridiculous comment about the NRA.  Really?  Why in heavens name would someone say such a thing about the NRA?

(http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8556/8700362281_18e5bbfea3_o.jpg)

Here is one of my favorite NRA video clips. 

2000.07.26 - 2000 NRA Convention - Charlton Heston - From My Cold, Dead Hands! (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ORYVCML8xeE#)
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: dcjulie on May 15, 2013, 05:45:55 PM
My comment wasn't about the NRA, just the badges sold by the NRA.  I can like an organization and dislike some of their products.  I think the badges are an invitation to significant legal problems.  My opinion, I have the right to express it.

I fully agree that the general public is shopping for the lowest price and shortest time in class for their CCW permits.  I just hope that when they get poor quality information, they don't end up paying for it dearly in either legal fees or their lives.
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: Gary on May 16, 2013, 12:51:08 AM
Here is a close up of the "ridiculous" NRA seal, badge, medallion, whatever you want to call it.

Here is the description from the NRA web site:

 When carrying concealed, it’s vital you have your CCW permit and your identification on you at all times. We’ve made it easy to keep them both in the same place. Our Concealed Carry Permit Wallet is comprised of American leather and features two windows for standard card sizes. This permit is small enough to fit in your front pocket, purse, or even inside your existing wallet. A shiny, metal NRA medallion is recessed into the outer leather of the wallet to show that you’re a member and law abiding firearm owner. Closed Dimensions: 3” x 3 ¾”. Color: Black. Made in USA.  
(http://www.nrastore.com/nrastore/images/additional/22582AVPS1.jpg)

"to show that you’re a member and law abiding firearm owner"

Do we as members of NRA, GOA, or NFOA have a problem embracing our colors, as we carry concealed? 

I have zero problem with it.   I am not ashamed or NRA, GOA, NFOA, NE CHP in any way.

Do I think showing this will get you discounts on donuts at Hy-Vee?   Not a good idea.  Can we show it to other interested gun enthusiast's, or other NRA members?  You bet.  Today, I was at an NRA class, and I proudly wore my NRA hat.

For kicks and giggles, I just ordered one.  Drop by my shop at 1st & O street anytime to see it in person. 
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: FarmerRick on May 16, 2013, 08:44:44 AM
I see a very significant difference between these two items...

(http://www.areagency.com/uploads/4/8/8/5/4885312/7293256.jpg)


(http://www.nrastore.com/nrastore/images/additional/22582AVPS1.jpg)


One is a BADGE, the other is the NRA logo.

One tries to be something that should not even exist, the other does not... IMHO.

Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: dcjulie on May 16, 2013, 08:59:39 AM
I agree Rick.  A badge, in my opinion, is just begging for "impersonating a law enforcement office" charges.
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: metaldoc on May 16, 2013, 10:25:10 AM
I took my CCW class from Mark Bohaty at Great Plains Rifle LLC. by Bruno, NE.  He is a former NSP officer and does a thorough job in his class.

He has one of those garish badges for show and tell.  His advice?  Do NOT carry one these!
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: JTH on May 16, 2013, 10:33:29 AM
Who here would like to poke fun at the NRA for selling a Concealed Carry ID holder, that looks very much like what Bruce is selling, only with a NRA twist to it? 

Considering that the NRA folder doesn't look in any way like a badge, and instead looks like a medallion, and the ones that are being sold elsewhere deliberately look like a badge...

...yeah, I'd say there is a significant difference.

Especially since you quoted the NRA page itself saying that it is to show NRA membership---which is obviously a completely different reason than the "CCW badges" being sold.

As such, your entire argument about the badges and all simply makes no sense.


Here's the thing:

Oddly enough, the people here want to obey the law.  We aren't happy about having to jump through hoops to exercise our rights, but we want to obey the law.  Part of that means taking an approved class that qualifies us to finalize the application for CCW.

If a person is demonstrably not teaching a class that qualifies, but is still passing themselves off as a CCW class instructor, then this will be a problem, because at some point in time, the State Patrol will investigate, and all the people who thought they took a qualifying class will find out that 1) their class fee is gone unless they are successful in suing, and 2) they can't carry until they take a REAL class and then re-apply.

If people are listing specific things that happened (or didn't happen) in a class, that specifically do not follow the state patrol requirements, and commentary is made upon it---you know what?  That's a good thing.

And if an instructor has a problem with that, well....all he has to do is show that his classes don't match the descriptions being given here.   If he can do that, hey, he's got a libel suit possible.

Quote
I can hint a storm is coming, but I cannot pull you guys out of the rain.

Maybe because we think you aren't a very good meteorologist, given past experience.



It is completely legal to sell the stupid CCW badges.  And completely legal to suggest them to people.  That doesn't make it smart, but it is legal.

However, teaching a ccw permit class in less than 4 hours including range time?  No.  Short of a class of advanced speed-readers who also have photographic memories, the amount of curriculum necessary to meet State Patrol requirements simply cannot be taught in that time.


Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: Gary on May 16, 2013, 11:03:41 AM
Do you think holding one up to an officer, or holding the other one up, in the first instances, of a shooting, will be instantly  and initially recognizable as being any different?

Proof that they could easily be seen the same as one member here had a first impression, the NRA symbol was "ridiculous" and now  siding with another member that says there are significant differences.   

So it is the quick, very possibly incorrect perception of the viewer (LEO, (or forum member in this instance)) we need to worry about at a shooting scene, not just what may be printed in small type on the pot metal medallion.

I went to Google, and typed in:


"Concealed Weapon Badge & Case"

Guess how many hits that brings up? 830,000.   By contrast, Disney Characters was 221,000,000, Chicken Soup Recipe was 35,500,000, mustache wax was 23,000,000, Harvey the pooka was 60,200, JFK was 53,500,000.

So while everything I tried in Google for popularity was more than CC badges, with the one exception of a 6' tall white rabbit, almost 1 million hits, is still a big marketplace.  It would seem, while the vast majority of the people here have stated they would not want one, somebody is offering lots of them for sale. 

Researching this, I came upon this badge


(https://encrypted-tbn3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRixtj5el3l4XzSmKC1JGTAiAQ-tfZzl61GxZY7XZ9Jy0otUdCh)


Does this tell us we have an over zealous ham radio operator?

Doing a search of "Badges" on Google came up with 340,000,000 hits.   Many times that of JFK.   In pages and pages of badges on Google Images, maybe one in 1,000 is a LOE badge. 

A pretty good article about badges can be found at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Badge (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Badge)

I found this, where a 17 year old was using a police issued cadet badge to buy alcohol.  Good story and accompanying video. 

 http://fox8.com/2013/04/30/police-teen-poses-as-officer-to-buy-booze/ (http://fox8.com/2013/04/30/police-teen-poses-as-officer-to-buy-booze/)
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: dcjulie on May 16, 2013, 11:37:37 AM
I never said the symbol was ridiculous, just the badges (I made an error, I misread the NRA info and thought they were also selling a badge, not just a medallion).  I have spoken to LEOs who say the badges are not a good idea.  They see them as a CCW holder trying to "impersonate" a LEO.

I'm not sure why anyone would want to hold up a badge/medallion/etc. to a LEO in any situation, especially if you've had to defend yourself with your gun.  They want your ID and CCW permit.  I could be wrong, but I'd think that if you flash a badge at a cop in a high-adrenalin situation, you might get tagged for impersonation. 

I am also not a fan of "advertising" my CCW status.  A badge in/on my wallet just seems wrong to me.  But, to each his own.
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: omahasnake on May 16, 2013, 12:00:25 PM
I've been reading all the posts this morning and find it interesting that no one has commented that the instructor in question had a loaded gun with him in the classroom.  One of the things in all my communications and when I first start class is that there are absolutely no live rounds allowed in the classroom...including myself...and anyone bringing ammunition into the classroom is immediately dismissed.  We use snap caps for any demo purposes or images/posters as needed. 

Regarding the badges, I tell folks that it could be considered impersonating an officer and I do not recommend them.... 
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: JTH on May 16, 2013, 12:04:29 PM
Do you think holding one up to an officer, or holding the other one up, in the first instances, of a shooting, will be instantly  and initially recognizable as being any different?

I think doing anything that stupid in the first instances of a shooting is a bad idea.

I think that the concept is a bad idea.

I think that there is a significant difference between "carrying a CCW badge to hold up to law enforcement" and "having a nice case to carry your ID and CCW permit" which really is the defining difference between the two situations.

I realize you are suggesting that they be used the same---but that isn't how the NRA puts it.


Quote
Proof that they could easily be seen the same as one member here had a first impression, the NRA symbol was "ridiculous" and now  siding with another member that says there are significant differences. 

She didn't say the symbol was ridiculous, and as she has already mentioned, she misunderstood something you said, and thought the idea of an NRA badge was ridiculous.

Quote
So it is the quick, very possibly incorrect perception of the viewer (LEO, (or forum member in this instance)) we need to worry about at a shooting scene, not just what may be printed in small type on the pot metal medallion.

Which is why the concept of a badge to hold up is stupid.

Which is probably why the NRA case isn't meant to be used that way.

Quote
I went to Google, and typed in:


"Concealed Weapon Badge & Case"

Guess how many hits that brings up? 830,000.

{snipped the rest of it because it is irrelevant to the discussion at hand}


What does that matter?  A search on "rape whistle" gives us almost 4 million hits---which means exactly nothing.  (Rape whistles are stupid and useless.)

The amount that something occurs on the web has very little to do with its efficacy.  May have to do with its popularity, but this discussion isn't about how popular CCW badges are, it is about how it is a bad idea.


In the end, the concept of having a CCW badge is bad for a number of reasons.  And if you believe that the NRA case equates to having a CCW badge, that's certainly your opinion, but it certainly isn't how the NRA markets that case, nor is it how it suggests that case should be used.

Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: Gary on May 16, 2013, 01:54:32 PM
As an NRA Certified Instructor, one thing you never do, and one thing you never let your students do is BRING LIVE AMMUNITION, PERCUSION CAPS, PROPELANTS or PROJECTLES INTO THE CLASSROOM!

Students firearms as well as ammo should stay stowed in their locked vehicle until such time the instructor advises you to do otherwise.

Nebraska has had two Negligent Discharges at class settings in a short span of time.  Bad things sometimes travel in packs of three.   Not again, if we are all careful, and really push safety in the programs we do.

Here is a ND I found on you tube the other day.  Guy has a good attitude about it, and I think he has learned from his error.   

Original Upload, I Just Shot Myself! (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYvAxLX6OzE#ws)

 
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: JimP on May 16, 2013, 03:08:47 PM
Quote
Regarding the CWP badges.....for what purpose do they serve

To quote Colonel Jeff, "What is it FOR?    ......Why, to SELL, of course!"

Caveat Emptor, indeed!
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: Gary on May 16, 2013, 05:34:47 PM
To quote Colonel Jeff, "What is it FOR?    ......Why, to SELL, of course!"

Caveat Emptor, indeed!


I read the whole Wikipedia article, and I think they missed that reason.
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: dcjulie on May 16, 2013, 09:47:03 PM
Well there's your problem Gary - you read Wikipedia.
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: FarmerRick on May 17, 2013, 06:00:50 PM
Take a wild guess who is set up at the Fremont Gun Show this weekend... with a table full of Jimenez pistols and CCW badges.




Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: Gary on May 17, 2013, 06:07:43 PM
Well there's your problem Gary - you read Wikipedia.

  I prefer sticking to issues, rather than post opinions that others in forums have problems.
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: Gary on May 17, 2013, 06:12:39 PM
Take a wild guess who is set up at the Fremont Gun Show this weekend... with a table full of Jimenez pistols and CCW badges.



I wonder how many people here have the gonads to walk up to his table and have a eye to eye talk with this guy, at his table in Fremont?     I will say hello to him, and wish him a good day.   I guess it is easier to poke fun behind others backs than talk one on one with someone. 
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: JTH on May 17, 2013, 07:26:38 PM
  I prefer sticking to issues, rather than post opinions that others in forums have problems.

Really?

Quote from: From Gary previously just in THIS thread
I would remind my fellow NFOA members, litigation comes in many forms, and forums.   Like some of our grandparents taught the fortunate among us, if you have something good to say.......
and
Quote
If you have not, yet you wish to run down his business, well, that is deep water you are swimming in.

and
Quote
I can hint a storm is coming, but I cannot pull you guys out of the rain. 

And, I'll note, when people posted discussion on the topic of CCW badges, you switched to a completely separate topic about NDs.

So.....what exactly ARE you trying to say here?

I, for example, are trying to say that 1) people should teach the approved State Patrol curriculum in its entirety for the CCW class, and 2) it is a stupid idea to carry a CCW badge.

If people aren't doing #1, then litigation is probably going to find them from disgruntled students, and an investigation from the State Patrol is probably forthcoming.  If people are doing #2 anyway, then hopefully they'll actually read commentary from respected national-level trainers like Massad Ayoob, and stop it before they do something additionally stupid that causes them more problems.

If you have a CCW permit, you aren't a cop.  Don't act like one.  And don't portray yourself as one.

Oh, and as for:
Quote
Do we as members of NRA, GOA, or NFOA have a problem embracing our colors, as we carry concealed? 

Thinking that a badge somehow equates to "colors" is simply wrong.  And if for some reason I see a need to show "colors" as I'm carrying concealed---then I'm not thinking clearly enough to conceal.

Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: FarmerRick on May 17, 2013, 10:33:51 PM

I wonder how many people here have the gonads to walk up to his table and have a eye to eye talk with this guy, at his table in Fremont?     I will say hello to him, and wish him a good day.   I guess it is easier to poke fun behind others backs than talk one on one with someone.

I confronted him about them at least a couple times a few years ago and told him how absolutely STUPID I though the badges were.  Seems that most others that are well versed in CCW training and what actually happens after a self-defense shooting happen to agree with that conclusion.
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: Gary on May 17, 2013, 11:58:37 PM
I confronted him about them at least a couple times a few years ago and told him how absolutely STUPID I though the badges were.  Seems that most others that are well versed in CCW training and what actually happens after a self-defense shooting happen to agree with that conclusion.


 I get it, that most of you guys have a deep seated fear of recognition badges.  With several trophy shops up and down O street, do you all break out into sweats, just driving by those places?

My wife is a 35 year employee of the State of Nebraska.  Every five years, the state gives her a badge, medallion, whatever you want to call it, recognizing her for years of service.    If she just flashed that badge, to most people, and then said FBI, up against the wall, in a stern voice, while her hands spun them around, I am sure that would work.

She works in a drug rehab program in the state pen.  Once an inmate passes their program, they are given a medallion, that looks pretty official, to remind the inmate to be good, and stay with the program.     If an inmate wanted to get into trouble, flashing that state issued medallion / badge, I am sure they could do so.    Is the state of Nebraska a foolish for passing out to inmates, badges to show completion of a drug rehab course?

I think the folks on this forum are way to paranoid about a symbol of compliance and recognition, which is all a badge is.   

Here is my wife's o so dangerous 35 year medallion.    Hope she never gets into trouble flashing that baby.  lol

(http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7409/8748860347_ed7abc5c14_n.jpg)

I have decided to show a little support for my fellow NRA member, Bruce Swartz, and I will drop by his table tomorrow and purchase one of his badges. 

Funny, I never wanted one, like I do now.    I will put it in the safe, next to all my wife's State issued badges for good service. 

Thinking about it, I believe you folks are correct, it is less than ideal for Bruce to sell his badges, he should give them out as a memento of completing his gun courses,  much the same way the state honors people who attend to a task, and complete it.   I will mention that to him. 

Does our friend Bruce, need to explain the use of a badge showing completion of a CHP class?  Possibly, doubt seriously he is ultra experienced in the development of web page design. 

What if the State of Nebraska offered to sell my wife her 40 year pin,  rather than give it to her?  What if they offered to sell them to the inmates for completing the drug education class rather than awarding them?  That would change the picture somewhat.

I want to thank everyone here for participating in this decision on badges, and any more ideas on the subject are welcome.   
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: FarmerRick on May 18, 2013, 07:23:02 AM

I get it,   


No, I don't quite think you do.
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: GreyGeek on May 18, 2013, 09:56:33 AM
My wife is a 35 year employee of the State of Nebraska.  Every five years, the state gives her a badge, medallion, whatever you want to call it, recognizing her for years of service. 

I worked in the Dept of Rev for 11 years before I retired.  I was given a couple of those "badges". Mine are small enough that I call them lapel pins.  I'm 6'6", 250 lbs and even  with my best intimidating voice I doubt I could convince anyone that I am with the FBI by flashing that lapel pin.   Maybe, with my commission as an Admiral in the Nebraska Navy I could fool them into believing that I am a retired Navy officer, if they don't examine the plaque too closely.
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: JTH on May 18, 2013, 12:20:40 PM
I get it, that most of you guys have a deep seated fear of recognition badges.  With several trophy shops up and down O street, do you all break out into sweats, just driving by those places?
Quote
I think the folks on this forum are way to paranoid about a symbol of compliance and recognition, which is all a badge is. 

Quote
Funny, I never wanted one, like I do now.
 
Quote
I want to thank everyone here for participating in this decision on badges, and any more ideas on the subject are welcome.   

Thank you for making your thinking and decision-making process clear.

You believe that pins, medallions, and badges are all equal and mean the same thing.  You believe that these things are all the same:
(http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2823/8750117505_b7707740c0_z.jpg)

...and that all of them will give the same meaning to people who see them.

This is in response to the people who are discussing the idea of carrying a CCW badge as said on the http://www.areagency.com/ (http://www.areagency.com/) website:
"You're threatened with deadly force, but your gun is out and pointed at the felon. You have your Concealed Handgun Permit Badge with you. The police pull up to the scene and the dirtbag shouts, "He's going to kill me. SHOOT HIM!" WHAT DO YOU DO? You display your BADGE to the police and shout, "DON'T SHOOT. I'M A LEGALLY LICENSED HAND GUN OWNER.""

...and according to you, all those things are the same, and the idea is perfectly fine.  (I note also that I had to do some work to make the badge, the medallion, and the pins similar-sized, which they most certainly aren't.)

And, as
Quote
an NRA Certified Instructor
this is your own personal opinion.  I'll note that you took the NRA class only a few weeks ago, you probably haven't even been credentialed yet by the NRA, and you haven't ever taught an NRA class, so I wouldn't throw around that certification too much yet...

...but anyway, here's my thoughts on your contentions:

I think that

1) You have made a lot of remarkably personal derogatory comments to a lot of other people,
2) You have made a lot of commentary that didn't have much in the way of logic to back it up, (nor much structure),
3) Your personal opinions, while apparently completely valid to you, make no sense to me at all (A: the pictures above are not similar as there is a significant difference between a badge, a pin, and a medallion; B: carrying a badge on your person to show people is an invitation to legal charges; C: your contention that wearing a badge is somehow "showing colors" seems ridiculous as the operative part of CCW is the "concealed" bit; D: showing immediate support for someone who is, according to witnesses, violating the requirements for teaching CCW classes, unsafe in said classes, and pushes selling an item that not one legitimate nation-level trainer says is a good idea ---this just seems like a bad idea, not that listening to stories on the internet is proof, but it certainly doesn't seem like a reason to unilaterally support him, either.)

Everyone is entitled to their own opinions, Gary.  (This isn't Bruce using a pseudonym, is it?   Trying to drum up support?  Or are you a business partner with Bruce?)  However, when you think that those opinions should influence other people, you are going to find that first they have to make sense, and secondly you have to be able to logically support them.

And among other things, comments like:
Quote
I get it, that most of you guys have a deep seated fear of recognition badges.  With several trophy shops up and down O street, do you all break out into sweats, just driving by those places?
...really isn't going to help you.

I'll note that I think you are wrong in just about everything you've attempted to argue.  That's my own personal opinion, though.

Oh---I'm an NRA Life member.  That doesn't make me automatically support anyone else who is an NRA member.  So when you say:
Quote
I have decided to show a little support for my fellow NRA member, Bruce Swartz, and I will drop by his table tomorrow and purchase one of his badges. 
...I see no reason to push that Mr. Swartz is an NRA member, nor that you are. I'm just not sure why that is relevant.  Just like I don't see any reason to continually shout that I'm an NRA Life member, because I didn't do it to gain recognition or make it easier to network.
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: RN4Guns on May 18, 2013, 01:26:05 PM
I may be late to the party here but what do the medallions have to do with the badges? And how does that even apply to conceal carry? I'm confused?  ???
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: bullit on May 18, 2013, 07:08:37 PM
JT ....please don't run Gary off.....this page has lacked a lot of entertainment value since "ArmedandHumerous" left the site.
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: Bucket on May 18, 2013, 10:23:42 PM
This thread = :facepalm:
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: ILoveCats on May 18, 2013, 11:40:34 PM
If you have a CCW permit, you aren't a cop.  Don't act like one.  And don't portray yourself as one.

Amen -- Best line in the thread right there.  A badge is something is earned, not bought.  It identifies the bearer as a public servant.  There simply is no such thing as a "concealed weapons permit badge".  It's oxymoron.  It does not exist.

Feralcatkillr's list of things that simply DO NOT exist....

1. Unloaded Gun

2. Shaken Martini (sorry, but James Bond was a putz in this regard)

3. Vodka Martini (this posting brought to you courtesy of Tanqueray gin)

3. Chocolate Martini (unless you're 22 years old and named Stacey, Tracy or Misty Lee)

4. Frozen Strawberry Margarita (unless you're a 56 y.o. man who pretends to be a 22 y.o. named Misty Lee)

5. CCW Badge

Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: stutzcattle on May 19, 2013, 09:26:44 PM
I contacted the state patrol officer that was listed earlier by email and also left a voicemail for him.  He has not contacted me.  I hate to see anyone in the gun world taken down, but this guy is a danger to the public and is doing no one a service but himself.  Of the 25 people that took his first class here, I know of only about 3 that are truly qualified to carry a gun.  I have spent a ton of time with my wife teaching her to shoot and she also attended the cornered cat class that was listed on this site.  Most of the people in his class arrived with no training and left with no training. 
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: TwoSwords on May 19, 2013, 11:00:41 PM
Nebraska's CCW training is some of the most complex compared to the states bordering, NE.

Concealed draw should be taught in a more advanced class IMHO.

But they made the rules.

NE - Fail the written - good bye
KS - Open book - Review of all the questions.
MO - No written Test

KS - 8 hrs
MO - 8 hrs

KS - 3,7,10 yards  3-yards is one handed
MO - Everything 7 yards,  must qual. with Revolver and Semi (Yes Odd I know)

Costs:   NE  - $125  going rate
             KS -  $65 and up
             MO-  $65 and up









 
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: bullit on May 20, 2013, 07:03:49 AM
NE - Fail the written - good bye


You do have to have mind of mush however to fail Nebraska's written exam.  To date, I know of no one who has from any of my trainer colleagues....
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: GreyGeek on May 20, 2013, 07:26:04 AM
You do have to have mind of mush however to fail Nebraska's written exam.

You give the written test too much credit!  :D

Even if one never read any material, slept through class and didn't look at the laws on CCW and just made logical guesses one could pass that test.   Stay awake in class and one should get 100%.
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: UPCrawfish on May 20, 2013, 08:18:33 AM
Stay awake in class and one should get 100%.

+1.....If you have an animated and engaging instructor as did I, you won't dare fall asleep !!
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: bullit on May 20, 2013, 09:23:33 AM
If you have an animated and engaging instructor as did I, you won't dare fall asleep !!

Especially is the rumor is true of the instructor lighting one off during the lecture.....
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: ghknives on May 20, 2013, 12:19:02 PM
A hidden expense that increases class cost is insurance. Some states have enacted laws that instructors can not be held liable for the mistakes of past students. Not so in Nebraska. Insurance like this is expensive and the cost is passed down to the students often making our classes more expensive than other states that have similar requirements.
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: metaldoc on May 20, 2013, 12:36:05 PM
I contacted the state patrol officer that was listed earlier by email and also left a voicemail for him.  He has not contacted me.   

Thanks for the update.

Hopefully there is or will be some investigation into this.  The NSP may not want to make an investigation public yet.

 With that thought, I wonder if any NFOA  members are state troopers?
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: Chris Z on May 20, 2013, 12:46:28 PM
I can assure you that NSP investigates issues with CHP instructors all the time, and they are not public about it. They often go undercover and pose as students taking the class. There is no better way for them to get the true story
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: OnTheFly on May 20, 2013, 02:26:00 PM
Of the 25 people that took his first class here, I know of only about 3 that are truly qualified to carry a gun.  I have spent a ton of time with my wife teaching her to shoot and she also attended the cornered cat class that was listed on this site.  Most of the people in his class arrived with no training and left with no training. 

Maybe a better word than "qualified" would be "proficient". In my opinion, everyone that has passed the NSP background check and has been issued a CHP was "Qualified" to carry before they were ever issued the CHP. It is just that the state requires a card to demonstrate that qualification.

With that said, the people who attend one of these classes cannot expect it to teach them everything they need to know about concealed carry and/or gun safety. In my opinion, people come to these classes expecting it to BBB all, and all of concealed carry knowledge. While many of these instructors have a great amount of information to impart on the students, there is no way that an eight hour course is all that is needed. The students have to take it upon themselves to further their knowledge, and become more proficient with their firearm.

There was one student in my class who was barely familiar with gun safety, let alone the gun that he had just purchased to carry concealed. I am CDO about my profession and hobbies, so I may be the exception, but I wouldn't consider going to any class without having the fundamentals down at the bare minimum.

 Just my opinion, but these students need to spend more time before and after the class becoming proficient.

Fly
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: Gary on May 20, 2013, 02:42:09 PM
Maybe a better word than "qualified" would be "proficient". In my opinion, everyone that has passed the NSP background check and has been issued a CHP was "Qualified" to carry before they were ever issued the CHP. It is just that the state requires a card to demonstrate that qualification.

With that said, the people who attend one of these classes cannot expect it to teach them everything they need to know about concealed carry and/or gun safety. In my opinion, people come to these classes expecting it to BBB all, and all of concealed carry knowledge. While many of these instructors have a great amount of information to impart on the students, there is no way that an eight hour course is all that is needed. The students have to take it upon themselves to further their knowledge, and become more proficient with their firearm.

There was one student in my class who was barely familiar with gun safety, let alone the gun that he had just purchased to carry concealed. I am CDO about my profession and hobbies, so I may be the exception, but I wouldn't consider going to any class without having the fundamentals down at the bare minimum.

 Just my opinion, but these students need to spend more time before and after the class becoming proficient.

Fly


Very Well Said! 
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: dcjulie on May 20, 2013, 03:10:06 PM
The purpose of the State CCW class (the class that students take in order to be able to get their permit) is to teach the students about the laws and evaluate a minimum of proficiency with their gun.  It is NOT to teach them to shoot.  It is NOT to teach them all about guns, shooting, holsters, etc.  People taking this class should come into the class already knowing how to shoot safely, and how to draw from concealment - safely. 

I have had people ask me about the class and whether or not it is a shooting class - meaning, does the class teach them to shoot or make them a better shooter.  When I tell them that it is not for complete beginners, they ask why not.  When I explain the purpose of the class, they decide they understand why it can't be a shooting fundamentals class.  There is too much required information to cover in a day.  I am not in favor of mandatory training/education about guns.  However, I do feel that anyone who owns or wants to own a gun should take the time needed to learn to be safe and proficient.  It saddens me, and scares me, when I see people out on the range who have NO CLUE how to use a gun safely.  The thought that these people would be able to pass a CCW class is frightening.

Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: Gary on May 20, 2013, 04:01:55 PM
Every year, how many people loose feet, because they do not understand the principals of a newly acquired lawnmower?  How many people end up confined to a wheelchair, or confine someone else to a wheelchair, because they do not understand how to operate a motor vehicle well?

People over their heads, is not limited to handgun usage.
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: GreyGeek on May 20, 2013, 05:23:17 PM
The students have to take it upon themselves to further their knowledge, and become more proficient with their firearm.

Very true.   The more they study and practice the less likely they will be victims of their own carelessness.   However, even the most experienced can experience an accident.  That's why they call them "accidents".  A recent example is the two dead Special FBI agents killed during training.   The YouTube is filled with negligent discharge videos.   One occurred almost two years ago, when a fellow shot himself with his Kimberly .45 ACP while practicing a fast draw with a new holster that required thumbing a lever to release the gun from the holster.  He received a lot of ridicule and mockery from those who consider themselves perfect and incapable of making a mistake.    A year later he discussed the accident and, like he did before, he took full responsibility and blame for it.   Here is his comment:
http://youtu.be/SEuBXWujeYQ (http://youtu.be/SEuBXWujeYQ)

Accidents happen to those who attempt skills that are beyond their training, and it happens to those who consider themselves too well trained to have an accident.
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: JTH on May 20, 2013, 06:06:36 PM
The YouTube is filled with negligent discharge videos.   One occurred almost two years ago, when a fellow shot himself with his Kimberly .45 ACP while practicing a fast draw with a new holster that required thumbing a lever to release the gun from the holster.  He received a lot of ridicule and mockery from those who consider themselves perfect and incapable of making a mistake.

It didn't help that Tex Grebner is an idiot, with extremely poor gun-handling skills in the first place. 

I note that he shot himself while using a SERPA holster, which requires using your index (trigger) finger to actuate the release, not the thumb.  The holsters that require using the thumb (such as the various Safariland ALS holsters) are excellent, and do not in any way contribute to NDs.  The SERPAs, on the other hand, have.  (Those folks who are using SERPAs, you all catch that?)

That being said, the SERPA use isn't what caused him to shoot himself.  After taking the gun from the holster, sticking his trigger finger on the trigger and applying pressure on the .45 like it was a Glock was what caused him to shoot himself. 

He received a lot of ridicule and mockery because he is an idiot.  Some of which, I'm sure, came from people who thought they were too good to ever ND.  However, much of it came from the fact that he is an idiot.

Quote
Accidents happen to those who attempt skills that are beyond their training, and it happens to those who consider themselves too well trained to have an accident.

I'll completely agree with that.
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: GreyGeek on May 20, 2013, 08:20:41 PM
I note that he shot himself while using a SERPA holster, which requires using your index (trigger) finger to actuate the release, not the thumb.

Yup.  Now that you mention that I remembered it.  If I could only have remembered it while typing that post.    :'(   I used to have a pretty good memory.  Almost photographic.  (Note to those who use NutraSweet ... don't.  It is what killed my memory and affects about 10% of those who  use it.)   I still do have a good memory, but she doesn't read anything about firearms or watch videos, so I can't consult her on those topics.   However, if I had a kid in my class for three or four years, 35-40 years ago, and we see him at the Mall, or someplace,   she'll recall his name and remind me.  Amazing.


P.S.-- I generally avoid calling anyone an idiot.   We are all smart.  Some in one thing and some in another.  Likewise, we are all stupid ...etc.     No one is smart all the time, and no one is stupid all the time.   Mock someone today but be sure that someday your turn will come.
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: Gary on May 20, 2013, 08:51:56 PM
NutraSweet


Aspartame,  the chemical compound name, under about 50 other names as well,  is hidden in our food and  is really bad for everyone.    Flat out against the law to place this stuff in food in many areas of the world, including Hawaii.   Causes blindness in some.  Is hard on everyone's eyesight.
Title: Re: A question about what CCW training should be....
Post by: Dan W on May 20, 2013, 09:13:59 PM
This thread has gone too far off topic